Has anyone maxed out yet.

[Nosscar]

I was just curious to know if anyone has managed to play X Rebirth on max settings at decent frame rates yet. If you have please post here. And please lets not have complaints (again),
just want to know if and how many have done it.
Please post your spec if you have maxed it,
Maybe a fraps screenshot too.

[sndle9]

I play it at 2560x1600 with all settings on max.

I get between 35-45 FPS and find it perfectly playable.

My system is an i7-3770K OC'd to 4Ghz with 16Gb and a single Titan graphic card. It runs Windows 8.1

So far, after 80+ hours I've had around 7 crashes with no clear single cause.

It has generally behaved with no performance issues, just the gameplay bugs that I know they will fix and an annoying lack of features which I hope will come later.

[Mauzi!]

I play it at 2560x1600 with all settings on max.

I get between 35-45 FPS and find it perfectly playable.

My system is an i7-3770K OC'd to 4Ghz with 16Gb and a single Titan graphic card. It runs Windows 8.1

Now that's interesting info, thank you for sharing.

So, the about strongest standard PC is just about right to play properly ? Dooh, so much for the system requirement information. And my gaming rig, haha !

[chikatilo]

1920x1080 everything on max, even those sliders to 100, solid 60 fps not a single gamecrash 40hrs played. Hardware see signature.

40 hours spent exploring the map and shooting stuff as nothing else works, but that's offtopic here.

[Dodgey]

I maxxed all but left view distance as standard, and AA on x2 as although the higher AA settings ran fine, I didn't notice any visual difference (might as well keep the fans quiet!)

i7 3770 3.5 running at 3.9
16Gb Ram
64bit win 7
SSD
ATI 6738

Runs lovely and smooth.

[chikatilo]

ATI 6738

Commercial name for that one is the HD6870, just helpin' out.

[sndle9]

I play it at 2560x1600 with all settings on max.

I get between 35-45 FPS and find it perfectly playable.

My system is an i7-3770K OC'd to 4Ghz with 16Gb and a single Titan graphic card. It runs Windows 8.1

Now that's interesting info, thank you for sharing.

So, the about strongest standard PC is just about right to play properly ? Dooh, so much for the system requirement information. And my gaming rig, haha !

The thing I find interesting is that if I reduce to 1920x1200 and turn most settings to minimum/off...

I STILL get 35-45 FPS when chikatilo gets 60 FPS from their system. None of my cores goes over 70% load while running with all on max so I guess the Xfire is the main difference.

[pirke123]

quadcore intel i5 overclocked to 4.5ghz
2x nvidia 580gtx (msi factory overclocked) in sli
16gb
win8
All graphics settings MAX (vsync, line of sight, etc) @ 1920x1200

Getting 25-40fps mostly. In certain area's in Albion it drops to 10, but I play in DeVries mostly, so I'm fine with the performance of all the beautiful space

[chikatilo]

The thing I find interesting is that if I reduce to 1920x1200 and turn most settings to minimum/off...

I STILL get 35-45 FPS when chikatilo gets 60 FPS from their system. Maybe its CPU bound from looking at the two systems.

So far I've seen the majority of people who post bad FPS on very high end rigs run Nvidia cards, it's common for a new engine to be either terribly optimized for crossfire or SLI, often either Nvidia or AMD is backing a game (you usually see which one on the loading screen) and "suprisingly" the game runs poorly on a dual card setup (coded for shit scaling) from the óther brand.

However, Rebirth isn't backed by either company and seems to run poorly on Nvidia in general, even single cards.

Not sure on this one, but there seems to be an Nvidia trend on ppl posting bad framerate.

[hawat]

I play it at 2560x1600 with all settings on max.

I get between 35-45 FPS and find it perfectly playable.

My system is an i7-3770K OC'd to 4Ghz with 16Gb and a single Titan graphic card. It runs Windows 8.1

So far, after 80+ hours I've had around 7 crashes with no clear single cause.

It has generally behaved with no performance issues, just the gameplay bugs that I know they will fix and an annoying lack of features which I hope will come later.

I think resolution has less effect on performance than lod/distance view/effect distance settings not to mention that the game looks far less impressive without those maxed.
Do you have all 3 of those set at 100 ?

[sndle9]

Not sure on this one, but there seems to be an Nvidia trend on ppl posting bad framerate.

I concur. My issue isn't CPU as shown in my post that I edited while you were quoting it. Still, its playable as is so no complaints on that front.

[sonnyVN]

I have everything max out that can be max and on good fps in few zone very slow on some maybe around 50-60 fps good zone 10-15 fps some zone
if I go lower setting would cause bad performance for some reason, but it cause my GPU to overclock at some stage and most of the time it stay max

[dlryan]

Max graphics, max FPS everywhere no problems...

EXCEPT the one sector with all the asteroids, where you first go to when you run through the gate once it's been activated by Plutarch....

Not sure why...makes no sense...but I go from 90~ fps to 10-15fps...


However...once I've gone and killed all the Plutarch ships guarding the gate...FPS went immediately back up to normal...

Theres something reallly hokey in that area for me

[metanoia]

I'm running on everything maxed, haven't checked my FPS but it runs silky smooth, had 1 hard freeze and 1 CTD. It's also just randomly flipped to desktop a couple of times but still been running fine when I alt tab back.

i7 4770K, Asus Z87PRO, GTX 770, 16GB RAM - nothing OC'ed yet, (I only built it a couple of weeks ago)

[sndle9]

I play it at 2560x1600 with all settings on max.

I get between 35-45 FPS and find it perfectly playable.

My system is an i7-3770K OC'd to 4Ghz with 16Gb and a single Titan graphic card. It runs Windows 8.1

So far, after 80+ hours I've had around 7 crashes with no clear single cause.

It has generally behaved with no performance issues, just the gameplay bugs that I know they will fix and an annoying lack of features which I hope will come later.

I think resolution has less effect on performance than lod/distance view/effect distance settings not to mention that the game looks far less impressive without those maxed.
Do you have all 3 of those set at 100 ?

For reference I'm running quick tests flying through the big pipework station in Concealed Hideout.

Res: 2560*1600
AA: 4x
AF: Greyed out. No choice.
Vsync / Shadows / SSAA: All On.
LOD / View D / EFF D: All 50
Shader: High

35-40 FPS.

Changing LOD / View D / EFF D back to all 100 reduced it to 30-35 FPS.

Turning Shader to Low raised it again to 35-40 FPS.

Guess I must have been somewhere less busy when I got 45 FPS over the weekend.

[chikatilo]

Max graphics, max FPS everywhere no problems...

We run it like a charm and got exactly thesame graphic cards, they are about thesame power as sndle9's Titan depending on how they're all clocked.

But if a dual card AMD setup (usually new games screw up SLI/CF) runs solid and a single NVIDIA card with about thesame power doesn't, it is very safe to assume Rebirth doesn't like Nvidia on its current drivers.

[chikatilo]

Still, its playable as is so no complaints on that front.

Until very recently you had the fastest consumer market CPU and Single GPU combination out there, you should complain if a Dx9 game on a 7 year old engine is just "playable"

[ICO_hr]

quadcore intel i5 overclocked to 4.5ghz
2x nvidia 580gtx (msi factory overclocked) in sli
16gb
win8
All graphics settings MAX (vsync, line of sight, etc) @ 1920x1200

Getting 25-40fps mostly. In certain area's in Albion it drops to 10, but I play in DeVries mostly, so I'm fine with the performance of all the beautiful space

Dude i'm with GF 570GTX, i7 2600k OC 4.0ghz, 8GB Ram and i get the same framerate and didnt drop below 20.I dont have only SSAO turn on, but i use SweetFX for extra AA, color correction and shit.

You should get more fps than me.WTF?!?!

[chikatilo]

quadcore intel i5 overclocked to 4.5ghz
2x nvidia 580gtx (msi factory overclocked) in sli
16gb
win8
All graphics settings MAX (vsync, line of sight, etc) @ 1920x1200

Getting 25-40fps mostly. In certain area's in Albion it drops to 10, but I play in DeVries mostly, so I'm fine with the performance of all the beautiful space

Dude i'm with GF 570GTX, i7 2600k OC 4.0ghz, 8GB Ram and i get the same framerate and didnt drop below 20.I dont have only SSAO turn on, but i use SweetFX for extra AA, color correction and shit.

You should get more fps than me.WTF?!?!

can you both plz look up and post your drivers here? This stopped making sense just here.

AMD : all good
NVIDIA : Titan and dual 580GTX slow
NVIDIA : 570GTX all good

The only thing a 580 GTX and a Titan have in common is thesame memory interface, which no other Nvidia card besides the "oddly balanced" 780 uses.

So it's that, the drivers, or witchcraft.

[sndle9]

Still, its playable as is so no complaints on that front.

Until very recently you had the fastest consumer market CPU and Single GPU combination out there, you should complain if a Dx9 game on a 7 year old engine is just "playable"

While I see your point I find the performance is enough to play the game and I expect/hope that it will improve over time once they get the more serious issues sorted.

Complaining about sub-par, but playable performance when others can't play it at all seems a little churlish so I'll leave it be.